STEM OUTREACH - Where are we failing?

Written by Georgie Aiuto

Edited by Yvette Marris

Many of us in STEM today would have childhood memories of going to museums, having goofy experts arrive at our schools to do experiments, or competitions where we had 72 hours to find a scientific solution. These are all STEM outreach programs. Over the summer, I conducted a small 6 week research project, as I wanted to know more about the state of outreach programs within Victoria, and see what opportunities were out there for young people and students.

So, I took a look at all of the STEM outreach programs within Victoria for people under the age of 18. Yes, all 1333 programs. And while I still have many more questions for how we are and should be running STEM outreach programs, I did manage to find some interesting imbalances. 

Starting with the types of programs, excursions were the most popular with 427 programs, followed by online learning at 229. While working on this, I wondered if the reason for this large number of online learning programs is due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This could be a great further research question. 

The discrepancy of discipline is one that most interests me. Especially coming from a Physics and Maths background. Biology takes all at 402 programs followed by Environment at 253! This means Biology makes up almost 6 times more programs than Maths. To me, this is concerning as Maths is a core STEM discipline. Psychology, Health Science and Geoscience are also lacking. However some organisations classified them under Arts or Humanities, meaning I wasn’t able to find the extensive list of these programs as they sit on the border of core STEM subjects. 

Another interesting comparison is where these programs are located. Locations were separated into 12 regions, as well as online or N/A, when a program either didn’t specify a location or was a travelling program (incursion or roadshow). Melbourne has 477 programs in its metropolitan region, followed by online and N/A, whereas Phillip Island, Great Ocean Road and High Country have very few. The Grampians have no local programs located within its region. There are still many schools within The Grampians and other parts of regional Victoria which have to rely on incursions or online resources due to there being no local science centre or museums. Although some venues in Melbourne offer transportation grants for rural towns to visit, it is still something we must consider as STEM educators. 

This got me thinking, if I - a student who is out deliberately seeking all this information for my research, would eventually find more on each program enough to make more conclusions on where there are gaps within our STEM Outreach programs. Unfortunately, this was quite a trudge through many many broken websites with hard to read text, broken links, missing images and more. How could a teacher or a parent seeking out activities for their students or children be able to find these programs? While some websites ask for a call to action to email or call the organisations directly for more information, teachers are some of the busiest and most overworked professionals. Without having accessible programs readily available, it can slow educators down and students may miss out on fun and inspirational activities. 

So now with all this data on STEM Outreach programs, how do we know it’s working?

Um…

We don’t.
According to the Australian Government Department of Education (1), STEM education initiatives such as excursions, incursions, residential programs (or camps), and equipment are still “unclear” in their effectiveness. In some cases we know that a lot of these programs provide aid with exams and grades, especially for those students whose schools cannot afford additional teaching material(3). However, whether or not these programs aid in STEM interest is still a mystery. 

Answering this question has been attempted by many PhD students and the organisations that run the programs themselves. We could compare if we all stop these programs simultaneously and see if STEM interest diminishes. But can we really risk that, just in case it is working? I myself have a lot of questions and cannot wait to jump into more research around this topic, but for you… reflect on your past and wonder, why are you interested in STEM? Could it be a family member? An epic excursion you went on as a child? A TV show you loved? Maybe it is time to take your younger sibling, cousin, children, students- whoever, on a fun trip to the museum! You never know what spark it might ignite.

References: 

1. https://www.education.gov.au/australian-curriculum/national-stem-education-resources-toolkit/i-want-know-about-stem-education/different-kinds-stem-education-initiatives 

2. https://djsir.vic.gov.au/victorias-lead-scientist/increasing-participation-in-science,-technology,-engineering-and-mathematics 

3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.21322 

Georgie Aiuto has a passion for Science Communication and closing gaps in STEM education for all Australian students. They currently study physics at Swinburne University of Technology. They had previously been a part of the Let’s Torque committee in 2022, but now are conducting various research projects around STEM Outreach. 

If you would like to connect with Georgie, please message them on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgina-aiuto-06a7211b1/ 

Doing science: collaborative or competitive?

Competition is the catalyst but collaboration is what produces real change. 

In the study of history there is an old, and somewhat misleading term, known as the ‘the Great Man in History’. Suggesting that the course of history is determined by the actions of one ‘great’ person, this theory from the 19th century sparks much debate amongst academics.

Take for example, a criticism from one of the founders of the science of sociology, Herbert Spencer:

"You must admit that the genesis of a great man depends on the long series of complex influences ... Before he can remake his society, his society must make him."

Indeed sociology, science of knowledge, or Indigenous knowledge, lends weight to the idea that science is the product of many events leading up to a great moment.

And even the ‘great’ moment can be a simple change with profound consequences. .

The Great Person Theory can be moulded to describe a view of scientific discovery - that scientific progress and the success of scientific efforts can be attributed to the discoveries of a few, great scientific minds. Alexander Fleming with the discovery of penicillin, Isaac Newton with gravity or Einstein with his theory of general relativity. It's hard to imagine where we would be, if not for their efforts, and there's nothing quite like a hero story. 

But underpinning all this intelligence and grit and determination, lies centuries of foundations and hundreds of small steps that made these ground-breaking discoveries possible.

Sure, fame and acclaim are powerful motivators and one hell of a prize. But for every history-altering discovery made, there are many, many smaller, less noteworthy discoveries to get there. It begs the question, in this modern day and age, who are the real heroes of scientific discovery? 

And when all the glam of success is stripped away, how do we keep the spark of curiosity alive? The thrill of the chase? And without it, what is the cost? 

By mid-2022, we will all be familiar with at least one truly emblematic example – COVID-19. The power and strength of collaboration in science could not be better illustrated. Since the declaration of an outbreak in late 2019, hundreds and thousands of virologists, microbiologists and immunologists were handed a new project, often at the detriment to already existing projects. 

From its initial outbreak to the first vaccine approval in just over a year, it leaves the previous record for fastest vaccine development in the dust – 4 years for the mumps vaccine [1]. And that’s not even to mention the average timeframe for vaccines which is in the range of up to 10 years.

As truly amazing of a feat the COVID vaccine is, examples of scientific collaboration are littered throughout history. The Human Genome Project was one of the largest collaborative research projects in history, with over 3000 researchers involved in the consortium shared authorship, across 13 years all over the world [2]. Similarly, the mission to eradicate polio, establish the International Space Station and the International Rice Research Institute are all global scientific endeavours to generate real, tangible change. 

The world came together and recognised these issues as global concerns and were able to act without the financial or labour restraints that so often prevent other projects from having the impact that young bright-eyed scientists imagine. 

As uplifting as these projects are, they serve as a reminder of the rarity of these profound, life-changing scientific endeavours. It’s not just the sheer number of people and amount of time needed.  

The thousands of scientific minds all working with a single goal is a large part of the tremendousness of the outcomes, on an international scale. But obstacles to this process include the cost and lack of attention from mainstream media. Like two sides of a coin, the flip side is that under this paradigm, only "popular" or "relevant" issues get addressed to the extent that this appreciable change can be made. Or at least within a time frame that those currently suffering can reap the benefits.

Large part of this is due to the seeming perpetuity of the drug development process, in which drugs often take at least 10 years to journey from pre-clinical trials to the marketplace.

Then, with the involvement of investors, the profit motive becomes even more apparent. In a 2020 publication by SOMO, an independent centre researching the multinational corporations, found that despite payouts to stakeholders of some of the largest pharmaceutical companies, increasing from 88% to 123% in 20 years, there was still a disproportionate increase in drug prices.

Argentinian economist Cecilia Rikap recently compared scientific co-publication and patent co-ownership and identified ‘a subordination of the universities, public research organisations and start-ups that have a fundamental role in the former, but an almost negligible participation in the latter’. 

Science is messy. Science is complicated. Science is multidisciplinary. With personal agendas, profit motive pressures, lengthy testing and approval procedures, and diverse epidemiologies of countless diseases, there will unfortunately always be issues. But there will always be heroes. Unsung heroes, who work tirelessly behind the scenes, without whom this progress could never be achieved.

It makes me, an overly idealistic, naïve (and certainly self-aware) 20-something year old, wonder what scientific progress could be made in a world without the financial burden of research and stakeholders, the quest for esteem and with nothing more than a burning passion to better the world. Maybe there is no “right way” of doing science. The motivation that comes with the glory of making a ground-breaking discovery balanced against the strength that comes from being a part of a larger group.

Certainly, that is too much to ask of this world, and probably always will be. But I will never stop wondering.

References

[1] Cohen S. The fastest vaccine in history [Internet]. UCLA Health. 2020 [cited 27 May 2022]. Available from: https://connect.uclahealth.org/2020/12/10/the-fastest-vaccine-in-history/

[2] Chial H. DNA Sequencing Technologies Key to the Human Genome Project. Scitable by Nature Education [Internet]. 2008 [cited 27 May 2022];. Available from: https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/dna-sequencing-technologies-key-to-the-human-828/

[3] Fernandez, R. and Klinge, T. (2020). The financialisation of Big Pharma. [Internet] Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen SOMO [cited 30 Jan. 2021] Available at: https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Rapport-The-financialisation-of-Big-Pharma-def.pdf

And the Winner Is ...

STEM Public Speaking Grand Final 2022

Written by Georgie Aiuto

Edited by Yvette Marris

It is already November! Wow, the year has gone by so fast. 

A month ago, the Let’s Torque crew held the Grand Finals for their STEM Public Speaking competition. It had been a massive year with three workshops building our fellow undergraduate’s Science Communication comprehension, workshops for John Monash Secondary School, multiple blogs, podcasts and other online content. But all of our work had come to a head for our final event of the year. 

Held at Royal Society of Victoria (RSV) in Melbourne, five incredible Grand Finalists presented their speeches to a sold out audience that Monday night. Hosted by Clare Mullen, a Senior Climate Science at the Bureau of Meteorology and a professional science communicator, these finalists went head to head for the 2022 Championship.

The grand finalist presented their speeches: 

• Amelia Safai with “Therapeutic Cloning - Will a sheep save lives?”

• Bianca Mazzucheli with “Auditory Sensory Prevention Technology”

• Breana Galea with “Designing our Destiny’s presentation: How Protein Predictions can Change the World.”

• Reah Shetty with “Revolutionising Society with a Chip”

• Nicholas Tze Hoe Chan with “Teaching ML to Smell: making machine learning more versatile”

Getting to the Grand Finals was no easy feat. Participants not only had two rounds of elimination, but also submit a compelling proposal of their STEM idea and its applications economically, environmentally and socially. They were really pushed to think outside the box, and they did so terrifically. The semi-final, held at the University of Melbourne’s busy on-campus bar, challenged them to communicate their ideas to the general public in a noisy and crowded setting. Once again, competitors excelled. 

Finally making it to the Grand finals at RSV, the finalists were presented with a new challenge, to give their speech in a professional lecture style room in front of an audience of 50 people. Here, we were fortunate enough to have three extraordinary professional science communicators to be our judges.

Alanta Colley; a comedian, science communicator and storyteller. With a background in International public health, her shows have been; 'Parasites Lost', 'Days of our Hives', and a recent science comedy debate series 'Sci Fight'. 

Chris Thompson; the Director of Education at the Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University and publisher in the fields of spectroscopy and computational chemistry. More recently in the field of science education and is co-author of Australia's most popular foundation chemistry textbook. 

And Sara Webb; a researcher focused on observational transient astronomy and a passionate science communicator who has presented on various national/international TV news programs, ABC radio, Joy FM, TikTok, face-to-face, and online presentations.

Not only did we have the incredible Grand Finalists’ presentations, but we also hosted three guest speakers to discuss their career and how science communication has helped them with their journey. 

Phoebe de Wilt; a Meteorologist at the Bureau of Meteorology took us through her personal science journey and how she was offered a role in various science communication jobs due to her passions for sharing her work to those who it affects, and being weather - that is everyone! 

Daniel Langley, a senior scientist at Universal Biosensors presented about his journey through various disciplines of science. A lot of his work overlapped with quite a few of the grand finalists topics, such as proteins and cloning. 

And finally, Ruwangi Fernando, an IT specialist and co-founder of STEMSisters and iSTEM explained the importance of communicating sciences to diverse audiences and how she strives to support women of colour in all STEM fields. 

All these incredible presentations were followed by a networking session for everyone to expand their connections. We were also treated with light refreshments and canapés. Let’s Torque crew member Jess has this to say about the event:

“The grand finals was an excellent evening! It was fascinating to hear all the speeches, and I got to hear about a whole variety of topics that I didn’t know much about - plus all of the participants were excellent speakers. It was also so valuable to be able to hear from industry professionals, and what brought them into science communication - the food and networking opportunities were great fun.”

Now, for the moment you’ve probably been waiting for (you might have even scrolled all the way to the button just to read this part), the winners of the 2022 STEM Public Speaking Competition! 

People’s Choice: Breana Galea with “Designing our Destiny’s presentation: How Protein Predictions can Change the World.”

Runner Up: Reah Shetty with “Revolutionising Society with a Chip”

And the grand winner of 2022…

Amelia Safai with “Therapeutic Cloning - Will a sheep save lives?”

Winners in the various categories were awarded an array of prizes, from cash to book vouchers, and some coveted memberships to some of Melbourne's greatest science establishments.

All these incredible speeches are uploaded to our YouTube Channel. Check out the playlist right here.

Sad you missed out? Stay tuned for next year’s competition or look out this November to see how you can join Let’s Torque’s 2023 team. 

Let’s Torque Workshop Wrap Up

At our first workshop for 2022, Science Beyond the Lab, we had the fantastic A/Prof Chris Thompson share some of his Science Communication wisdom and ran some pretty fun activities. In case you couldn’t make it, here is a wrap up of what happened.

So, what did we learn?

Why does Science Communication matter?

Despite the fact that not everyone is as science-mad as the rest of us, there’s no denying that science plays an integral role in the way we live our lives - from the technology that permeates our everyday lives, the medicine we take, to the discoveries that are yet to be made that will revolutionize our way of living.

There is simply no avoiding it. And yet, for something so inescapable, accessibility and understanding is still a huge obstacle. At Let’s Torque, we believe that scientific knowledge shouldn’t just be limited to those who have already committed themselves to the field.

Science communication, as described by Sam Illingworth and Grant Allen, is an umbrella term that centers around four key pillars - Informing, Educating, Raising Awareness and Sense of Wonder. 

So, who are we doing this for?

So science has a universal presence but how do we harness it to produce real change? By targeting and aligning three main stakeholders: the general public, policymakers and business leaders and aspiring scientists. Without the support of all three, it would be impossible to get enough support - either in the form of public interest, or financial backing. We’ve seen this interrelation clearly in the last two years, with the COVID-19 outbreak. When the interest of the general public, aspiring scientists and policymakers all align, the advancements in science and technology are monumental.

The general public is the most important stakeholder, as what we do must help people and in turn pressure from the ground up drives influence and change - particularly when policymakers and businesses are looking for a financial motive to invest in an issue.

Finally, the future of society, health, technology and the environment are dependent on passionate and articulate scientists who can effectively communicate the importance of their work to the rest of the stakeholders.

Workshop Activities

With all this in mind, we shaped our workshop with the goal of exploring Science Beyond the Lab. 

The first activity was called the Abstract Prompt - where we gave participants a list of technical abstracts for articles, typified by jargon, and were asked to write a new title, to be captivating and engaging - without compromising the scientific integrity.

Huge shoutout to Joshua Nicholls - Head of Education 2022 and Winner of Let’s Torque 2021, for this example!

Participants did an incredible job with this activity. Using language tips and tricks, such as word play, alliteration and rhyming, the groups were able to flex their writing skills as well as their knowledge of science. The results: a series of very funny and engaging titles, from a range of frankly quite overwhelming abstracts.

The following activity was an activity about understanding the Audience and how that might shape how you pitch the information. Groups were assigned an audience and new article at random - and were asked to plan and present how they might communicate the information in the article.

Combinations of articles and audiences included an article about evidence against the proposal that vaccines caused autism to be explained to Karen, a middle aged, suburban mother of three. Or an article about the potential therapeutic benefits of Naltrexone to help with alcohol addiction, to be explained to a disgruntled bartender.

The resulting skits were, again, hilarious and engaging. It was fantastic to see participants really understanding the importance of knowing the audience in order to effectively communicate scientific concepts. 

“The event was in general really fun and an eye-opener for me into science communication” Sirui Fang, a second year Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science at Monash University told us, “and the activities we had, made the day more interactive and engaging”

Overall, it was a great evening and the team at Let’s Torque is so grateful for all those who showed up and got involved! The online resources are now live on our website and we encourage you all to follow us on social media and stay tuned for updates about the next workshop on May 30th.

2021 Let's Torque Grand Final

Amidst the excitement of Science Week, Let’s Torque held their annual STEM public-speaking competition.

We were honoured to witness the sharp and engaging presentations from some of the finest undergraduate science communicators!

Our fantastic judging panel featured esteemed science communicators: Catriona Nguyen-Robertson (@CatrionaNR), Dr Leonie Walsh (@lkw_sci) and Dr Shane Huntington (@DrShaneRRR).

The keynote address from Zoos Victoria’s wonderful Dr Marissa Parrott (@drmparrott) discussed the need for effective science communication to tackle misinformation and spark environmental protection.

It was inspiring to learn about the widespread impact of campaigns such as “When Balloons Fly, Seabirds Die”. Although this began as a call-to-action initiative discouraging plastic balloon use, the campaign succeeded with the recent statewide balloon ban.

Moving on to the competition. Another special thanks to each of the grand finalists for your enthusiasm and diligence behind the scenes. We are deeply grateful for your swift adaptation to the online transition of competition.

Fourth-place finalist, Luke Antzoulatos provided an insightful introduction into the novel application of nanoparticles against bacterial infection. Will a “cocktail” of nanoparticles become a remedy in the near future?

Nano-Terminators - Luke Antzoulatos

Sticking to the theme of a small-scale concept catapulting into far-reaching effects, audience favourite, Georgina Aiuto pondered how a snappy second affects GPS accuracy. Following the 2019-2020 bushfires, conservation of native animal populations may depend on how we define a “second”…

Take a Second for the Future - Georgina Aiuto

Just narrowly short of first-prize, Sanjeeban Chattopadhyay’s impactful delivery addressed a fresh solution to urban flooding. To keep your stroll in the streets flood-free, permeable pavements can absorb and redirect excess rainwater.

Permeable Pavements: A Key Design for a Water-sensitive Future - Sanjeeban Chattopadhyay

Finally (drum roll please), our first-place winner, Joshua Nicholls glimpses into the technical advancement of the bionic eye. Although replicating an organ is its own feat, it will have profound benefits for the visually impaired community.

Bionics: Seeing into the Future - Joshua Nicholls

Deepest gratitudes to RSV and our advisory board, as well as the Let’s Torque team for pulling this event together.

Missed the livestream? Don’t fret! Watch the 2021 Grand Final here.

Workshop 1 - 2021: Science Beyond the Lab

Let’s recap our very first (and technically second) workshop of 2021!

Jack from Let’s Torque introducing Workshop 1.

On a chilly April evening, we were lucky enough to host Workshop 1 and take shelter within the cosy function room at the Royal Society of Victoria (RSV).

We had the wonderful, singing scientist Catriona Nguyen-Robertson as our guest speaker. The PhD candidate and lecturer at The University of Melbourne is known for outreaching STEM online towards fresh, non-traditional audiences through her catchy scientific earworms.

It was inspiring to hear Catriona share her own passion, visions and some first-hand experiences as an avid science communicator!

Workshop 1 focused on exploring and appreciating the importance of science communication. As well as how to tailor complex scientific concepts towards varying audiences.

Interestingly, as science progresses into more specialised and complex forms, a study finds that research papers are becoming more difficult to read. This is problematic as it can catapult the general public away from trusting and engaging with STEM.

Miscommunication or a lack of understanding of science can erupt confusion and conflict within society and politics. This can be seen in the varying responses to COVID-19 globally.

Catriona Nguyen-Robertson (on right) helping some workshop attendees reinvent lengthy scientific abstracts and press releases into captivating headlines.

Caitlin from Let’s Torque introducing Workshop 1.

Royal Society of Victoria (RSV)

Contradictorily, while scientific papers with amusing titles are more likely to attract everyday audiences, readers find these papers to be less credible.

Attendees were tasked to solve this conundrum. Each group was missioned to create both informative and compelling headlines from a set of abstracts and press releases.

While it was tricky enough to translate the strings of jargon and convoluted concepts into a snappy sentence, the twist was that each group had a unique target audience. They ranged from extraterrestrial life to Medieval peasants to modern day toddlers.

This lead to some very creative and entertaining answers…

Thanks again to Catriona for spending her Wednesday evening with us! Thanks to RSV for the lovely venue!

To meet both the flattering popularity of the workshop and gathering limits, the team swiftly adapted our ONE 90-minute workshop into TWO back-to-back sessions. Despite the all the chaos and coordination, it was rewarding to see it all through! Thanks to all the Let’s Torque team members for their efforts behind the scenes and in front of the scenes!

Finally of course, thank-you to everyone who attended!!

The Let's Torque Team (from left: Eloï, Mitchell, Matthew, Jack, Caitlin) with Catriona Nguyen-Robertson

We’re excited to launch our official second workshop in the lead up to our STEM public-speaking competition! Just a reminder to submit your Talking Points before the June 30 deadline.

Workshop 2: Science Speaks Louder than Words will deep dive into the overlooked non-verbal aspects of science communication. Come along to learn how you can enhance your communication skills and engagement with your audience. We’ll explore the design psychology behind successful visuals and how to employ effective physical communication such as through body language, stance and posture.

Swapping the stage for the screen

By Michelle Nguyen

A global pandemic has reinvented much of our lifestyle – from the way we interact, work and learn. The drag and drop of our existence onto monitors and LCD screens has been quite draining. Yes, I’m recalling those never-ending zoom classes… Despite all of this, science communicators are embracing digitalisation and getting creative. They’re now connecting with a wider and more diverse audience by swapping their scientific stage for the screen.

As a many of us know, science can be tricky to explain, let alone understand. Concepts can be so convoluted that in the time it takes to convey a crux of quantum chemistry, you could probably bake a cake. Or two.

Now what if I told you, you only had a quarter of a minute to do so?

Some science communicators are now taking on this challenge. They’re connecting with a global audience from their living rooms through TikTok, a social media platform based on posting brief informal videos, most popular from ages downwards of 24. With TikTok surpassing a staggering 2 billion lifetime downloads world-wide, STEM is being outreached to a younger and wider viewership beyond a niche of specialists! Creators are capturing our short attention spans by linking abstract ideas to our everyday lives through skits, dance routines and art. You don’t need a scientific background to understand the concepts. It’s an opportunity for anybody to learn and interact with convoluted concepts from the couch.

 After being encouraged by his students, chemistry teacher, Phil Cook (@chemteacherphil) posted his lab demonstration of a gummy bear exploding into flames while being oxidised in a test tube of potassium chlorate. Cook says “I went away for the weekend and came back to 5,000 or 10,000 followers.” To date, he has earned over 3.4 million followers!

Other social media including YouTube, Instagram and Twitter also home a growing voice for science communicators. Chemistry and physics teacher, Jonte Lee transformed his kitchen into at-home lab to broadcast his lessons through Instagram Live. He noticed that despite the stresses of the COVID-19 pandemic, his students’ marks improved compared to previous terms; no student earned less than a C! Lee was even contacted by viewers beyond his hometown, Washington.

As digital communication takes on innovative forms, there is an exciting future for sci comm as well.

 Although social media can be a messy landscape, this kind of STEM outreach has an immense scope of benefits. By making complicated content more engaging, it can break down the illusion of STEM being elitist. Since STEM is vital for understanding how the world works and how we exist in it, these ideas should be more accessible to society. These ideas should be less alienating, more relatable and easier to grasp. We as scientists have the power be creative in how we present ideas and findings.

 Sharing new discoveries or explaining older theories can help the community trust science more. While online media can be shallow and misleading, by making STEM more accessible to the public, we can inspire curiosity, as well as critical thinking. Social media can also get more people talking about an issue and raise awareness. There is opportunity to shine a light or a new tone on an overlooked topic.

 This opens conversation beyond a specific and specialised group of experts. It welcomes more people from different walks of the life to get involved regardless of their background. Issues like how to overcome a pandemic or how to achieve sustainable future impact everybody in some way. It makes sense to involve as many voices as possible to come up with the best solutions to suit a diversity of needs. This could greatly assist with policy making and lead to further research to ultimately

While digitalisation places a glass barrier between us, it also refracts creative alternatives for how we connect with one another. How else can we revolutionise sci comm?

 Take a look at these #scicomm accounts:

• @chaoticallyscience (TikTok)

• @lab_shenanigans (TikTok)

• @mrp_chemistry (TikTok)

• @rememberthewild (Instagram)

• @scidocmartin (Instagram, Twitter)

• @nyuroscientist (Instagram)

• @scigallerymelb (Instagram)

• @lkw_sci (Twitter)

• @LynPlen (Twitter, Instagram)

• @hypothejess (Twitter, Instagram)

• @DjukeVeldhuis (Twitter)

• @isobelccampbell (Instagram)